Chip War: The Fight for the World's Most Critical Technology Hardcover – October 4, 2022

I have the hardback, which is 431 pages including acknowledgments, extensive notes and index. There are 351 pages of text itself. The book is well-written and a relatively easy and informative read for which the author deserves credit. There are some good reviews of the book that outline the history of the development of the chip and some of the seminal figures involved in its development. I live in Dallas close to the central Texas Instruments plant where Jack Kilby and Morris Chang, whose contributions to the creation of the chip industry are outlined, worked. In the very late 1980s, Texas Instruments was a member of a chamber of commerce with which I volunteered. TI invited us over for a presentation. During the presentation TI observed that they had developed systems that would allow the US to send a missile 800 miles and hit a target the size of a barrel. This claim was impressive and the gentleman sitting next to me leaned over and whispered in my ear "I'll bet the Russians have a bulls-eye drawn around this place." A few years later in the 1st Gulf War, TI's claim was verified. You don't have to persuade me that computer chips are a critical technology.I divide the book into the first roughly 2/3rds that looks at the history of the chip and the US role in its development. This role in fabrication and lithography was initially critical. But, as noted in the book, "America's technological lead in fabrication, lithography and other fields had dissipated because Washington convince itself the companies should compete but that governments should simply provide a level playing field." Pg. 298. Other governments, particularly China, did not share this view.The last roughly 1/3rd of the book, largely beginning in Section VII, looks at the Challenge of China. The history is interesting, but if you're mainly interested in the Chinese competition and the effects of globalization, you may want to start here and see what the author has to say. TSMC, located in Taiwan, manufactures a large percentage of the more sophisticated chips used globally. ASML, located in the Netherlands, manufactures basically all of the lithography equipment necessary to manufacture high-end chips. Korea and Japan manufacture meaningful amounts of the chips necessary for cars, phones, etc., but the loss of TSMC in, for instance, an attempt by China to take over Taiwan would have a huge impact on our daily lives.It's also not clear that the Netherlands intends to willingly relinquish its primacy in manufacturing essential lithography equipment. So, the book explores the effects of U.S. efforts to globalize the manufacture of chips. The U.S. has tried to maintain some primacy of the design of chips in Silicon Valley and the book looks at some of these efforts. Recently the U.S. government has recognized the shortcomings of globalization and is trying to bring chip manufacturing back to America.The author makes a compelling case that computer chips are a critical technology. The history of the development of this technology and U.S. competition with China are the focus of this book. If these topics are of interest to you, I recommend the book highly.

This is a super engaging book! Well organized. It delves into a little bit of engineering and a lot of politics about the chip industry. I highly recommend this!

Well researched book that follows the Chips industry from its early infancy until 2022. As the sector is still evolving rapidly, this book is already a bit outdated and better used for historical references.Despite his best efforts to stay objective, the author invariably portrays the US as always "reasonable" while other countries are either "cheating" or "dangerous". For example, while many US chip companies are "heroically" helping US military to create deadly weapons, any Chinese tech company with any military association should be blacklisted.The author also annoyingly mentions "Gordon Moore" and "Caltech professor Carver Mead" together, many times, ignoring the fact that Moore himself is a Caltech PhD.

Chip War is a well timed history of semiconductor manufacturing and the intellectual currents that drove offshoring as well as bring concern over national security. The book is both historically informative as well as currently illuminating for thinking about the current US - China frictions on semiconductor manufacturing. One can learn about the pioneers of the industry and the history of government involvement as well as the cycles of intellectual property concerns. Chip War is both highly relevant for better understanding today's world of widening geopolitical fault lines as well as contextualizing how similar and or different things are today vs the past.The book starts out something along the lines of Walter Isaacson's Innovators giving the history of silicon valley and the discovery of transistor by Bardeen and Brattain, and then Shockley. The key characters who built up Silicon Valley and the entrepreneurial spirit that they embodied is highlighted so that one gets a sense of the early days in the valley. The competitiveness but also fluidity of the system led to significant innovation in the early days and the author gives a picture of the ecosystem. The first construction of the integrated circuit is discussed and the early development of logic chips is highlighted. The author is quick to highlight that copying technology is no route to success as its not technical knowledge but process expertise which is critical, understanding how to scale the business and increase yields is the key to consumer businesses which are critical for true scale. The Soviet Union attempted to catch up on semi-conductors via espionage which was a strategy destined for failure and the author gives the strong reminder that innovation is what drives the business not replication. At the early stages of the tech revolution the US dominated but was insulated from competition.The author moves on to the world as the conditions changed and Japan caught up. At first it was licensing technology on lower end goods but with Sony and others the tech gap narrowed and it looked like Japan was on the track to outpace the US. The US appeared to be lagging a more disciplined competitor with subsidized capital that was more cost competitive. Thus the reader gets a reminder that tech competition is not new and there is a strong reminiscence today of the competition with Japan in the 80s. Ultimately the concerns about Japan were overblown and eventually the US regained its intellectual lead where its competitive edge was strongest but with the exception of Micron, tech hardware manufacturing was slowly moving offshore. The author then moved on to the origins of TSMC and a little bit on Samsung. In particular for TSMC one learns that Morris Chang, founder of TSMC was a TI executive and not actually Taiwanese. Nonetheless the story of the rise of Taiwan in the tech supply chain is discussed and the relevance of the ambiguity with regards to China completely overlooked. The era of offshoring was the era of globalization where cost efficiencies were what determined capex decisions and the US government was not in the business of subsidizing capital despite the rest of Asia fully embracing that.The author moves on to China and the growth of a new kind of competitor. This competition was not as concerning until the last decade. Huawei is discussed as is the IP theft from Micron and the challenges of moving up the curve is highlighted with the lack of progress by SMIC. Chip Wars does a good job of bringing in the need of cutting edge processes for military dominance and the greater frictions that are arising due to these security concerns with China that were absent with prior competitions. The disregard of intellectual property is also highlighted through the Micron fiasco where Chinese courts used their system to blackmail Micron, though this backfired. Finally the author moves on to EUV and the astronomical complexity of the manufacturing process. The true complexity is used to show the fundamental challenge of trying to fast track your way to the cutting edge of tech hardware manufacturing. It is also used to highlight the truly global collaborative environment that was embraced to develop the technology and that same environment also led to offshore from the US without a concern.We are now in a new era where supply chain stability is being reconsidered as more important than supply chain cost. For technology this has big repercussions. On the margin we can certainly see the reverberations with the chip equipment export constraints and it is likely that these are used on a continued basis to manage competition in a fundamentally different way than in the past. To understand the history so that one can better appreciate the context, Chip War is a must read.

Interesting.Easy to read.Short enough.Thank you for putting this together here.Good read.Thanks!!!!!!!That would be it.