




Buy Jockey Men's Underwear Pouch Brief - 3 Pack, Blue Spring/Just Blue/True Navy, M and other Briefs at desertcart.com. Our wide selection is elegible for free shipping and free returns. Review: Perfect Fit and Function — Exactly What I Wanted - I’ve seen some negative reviews about the high rise on these briefs, but honestly, that’s exactly what I was looking for — and these Jockey briefs fit the bill. Yes, they are truly full rise (I’m 6’2”, 205 lbs, wearing a size Large), and they sit high, as advertised. That’s part of what makes them so comfortable and supportive. The pouch design is excellent — supportive without being restrictive, and it adds a level of comfort that’s hard to find in most standard briefs. One note on sizing: in my opinion, Jockey runs a bit small, so I’d recommend sizing up if you’re on the fence. I’ve included photos showing the fit on a real person, as I find this gives a clearer sense of sizing, coverage, and rise than stock images alone Review: Kangaroo pockets! - I am going to give you a comparison between Jockey & Munsingerwear briefs. I have worn Munsinger Wear briefs for many years because I really prefer the kangaroo pocket over the side pockets. The pairs I currently have were getting old, so I went looking to purchase more. Apparently the grey and black colors are no longer available, and I prefer them because they don't show stains as much as the white briefs do. SO, the only decent and reasonably priced alternative was the Jockey brief with the kangaroo pouch. Notice in the picture how they compare. Both sizes are XL. The waists were the same - 33.5", but the Jockey felt a little tighter probably because of a little wider waist band and heavier material. The pocket on Jockey was 4" wide compared to 5" wide on the Munsingerwear. And the distance from the waist band to the top of the kangaroo pocket was 6.5" for the Jockey and only 4.5" for the Musingerwear. The length from the top of the waist band to the bottom of the briefs was 16" on the Jockey, and 13" on Munsingerwear. Some previous reviews complained about that. I found it didn't make much difference for me since I prefer loose fitting briefs. The Jockey waist band is about an eighth inch wider. While I like the older style Munsingerwear colored briefs a little better than the new Jockey briefs, I find both of them to be comfortable and suitable to my needs. I'm 6'2" tall and about 39" under my belly where I wear the briefs. Jockey stretches just fine, but do seem to be tighter than my older ones, but certainly not uncomfortable. I don't have any problem with the waist band curling over - and it should with my current "build". I hope this review helps some of you. I will certainly purchase again if I need anymore before I die. I expect to get several years of wear (3-6 years, maybe more) of of these Jockey briefs. That's what Munsingerwear has done for me, and Jockey seems to be every bit the same or better quality. The packages I received were made in Cambodia.























| ASIN | B06XYPNCCB |
| Best Sellers Rank | #53,258 in Clothing, Shoes & Jewelry ( See Top 100 in Clothing, Shoes & Jewelry ) #57 in Men's Underwear Briefs |
| Customer Reviews | 4.2 4.2 out of 5 stars (2,628) |
| Date First Available | April 14, 2006 |
| Department | mens |
| Item model number | 1145 |
| Manufacturer | Jockey |
| Package Dimensions | 5 x 4 x 2 inches; 1 Pounds |
R**G
Perfect Fit and Function — Exactly What I Wanted
I’ve seen some negative reviews about the high rise on these briefs, but honestly, that’s exactly what I was looking for — and these Jockey briefs fit the bill. Yes, they are truly full rise (I’m 6’2”, 205 lbs, wearing a size Large), and they sit high, as advertised. That’s part of what makes them so comfortable and supportive. The pouch design is excellent — supportive without being restrictive, and it adds a level of comfort that’s hard to find in most standard briefs. One note on sizing: in my opinion, Jockey runs a bit small, so I’d recommend sizing up if you’re on the fence. I’ve included photos showing the fit on a real person, as I find this gives a clearer sense of sizing, coverage, and rise than stock images alone
G**N
Kangaroo pockets!
I am going to give you a comparison between Jockey & Munsingerwear briefs. I have worn Munsinger Wear briefs for many years because I really prefer the kangaroo pocket over the side pockets. The pairs I currently have were getting old, so I went looking to purchase more. Apparently the grey and black colors are no longer available, and I prefer them because they don't show stains as much as the white briefs do. SO, the only decent and reasonably priced alternative was the Jockey brief with the kangaroo pouch. Notice in the picture how they compare. Both sizes are XL. The waists were the same - 33.5", but the Jockey felt a little tighter probably because of a little wider waist band and heavier material. The pocket on Jockey was 4" wide compared to 5" wide on the Munsingerwear. And the distance from the waist band to the top of the kangaroo pocket was 6.5" for the Jockey and only 4.5" for the Musingerwear. The length from the top of the waist band to the bottom of the briefs was 16" on the Jockey, and 13" on Munsingerwear. Some previous reviews complained about that. I found it didn't make much difference for me since I prefer loose fitting briefs. The Jockey waist band is about an eighth inch wider. While I like the older style Munsingerwear colored briefs a little better than the new Jockey briefs, I find both of them to be comfortable and suitable to my needs. I'm 6'2" tall and about 39" under my belly where I wear the briefs. Jockey stretches just fine, but do seem to be tighter than my older ones, but certainly not uncomfortable. I don't have any problem with the waist band curling over - and it should with my current "build". I hope this review helps some of you. I will certainly purchase again if I need anymore before I die. I expect to get several years of wear (3-6 years, maybe more) of of these Jockey briefs. That's what Munsingerwear has done for me, and Jockey seems to be every bit the same or better quality. The packages I received were made in Cambodia.
G**E
We have tried many options these seem to be the best fit.
These were not for me so no pictures! The recipient told me that the family jewels stayed comfy and they were sized right. The only suggestion would be to look for mid-rise if you don't wear grandpa pants or need something shorter for post surgery. Wearer is tall with a slender build.
H**N
Good quality product
Comfortable, fit good, priced right.
R**R
Good quality and fit
Good quality at good price, took long time in delivery.
D**M
When you buy clothes made in Asia, going two sizes oer is not enough
First problem is the size. Clothes made over there in Asia are suitable for children's dolls in America. I knew that but I believed they were telling the truth about the size since these expressed it in inches = 32-34 - not cm. But they lied. They are tight, but the pouch is big enough for me so I wear them. Second lie was that they are cotton. They are made of elastic material so they cling to you. I am not big. And after showering when I stretch these things over my small, average frame they stick to my skin. Also, they rip easily, because they are not really cotton and I am not really strong as I once was, but I tried to stretch the dam leg hole wider and the material tore apart.
A**R
Sizes are small
Have worn Munsingwear size 34 pouch underwear for years. Now you cannot buy the brand anymore, so was looking to buy more briefs. These are the only pouch underwear I can find. It is sad you cannot buy a specific size anymore, just these multi size. I bought the Medium, supposed to be a 32 to 34. Not even close, these are comparable to a small. Do not fit. Way to tight. Now I don't know what size to order. It is a sad day when you cannot buy clothes for your size. Have to buy multi size and hope it will fit. Miss the old Munsingwear. These are not the answer.
M**N
Hard to find front pouch briefs
Front pouch is great
A**R
Good fit. Like the pocket
F**N
Slip kangourou au style très particulier, avec une poche très fonctionnelle et qui monte très haute. Parfait
A**T
Muy práctico 😃👏
A**B
It's frustrating that Jockey don't sell the pouch H front underwear in the UK. These are quality underpants, fit well and very pleased with my order. The delivery time was awesome arriving a week ahead of schedule!
T**O
Just noticed these listed on Amazon Canada for $21.99 (3 pack) for up to and including size XL. Until now I have been buying size 2XL (3 pack) and these have been exceptional both for comfort and fit. Will see how the XL size works out. Pricing makes no sense but I'm just happy these are available. Since we "lost" Sears and Target here in Canada shopping for bare essentials (excuse the pun) outside the major cities is a nightmare.
Trustpilot
1 day ago
1 month ago