Under ArmourBoys' Utility Baseball Pant, (100) White / / Black, Youth Small

We have a petite 7 year old son who was swimming a little bit in the small but once we added his belt, they cinched perfectly and didn't look too big anymore. These are also on the more affordable side of name brand athletic wear.

My 11-year-old is pretty skinny (56" tall, 65 lbs.), so I ordered a small. The waist fits, but the legs are a bit tight and short (definitely not "loose fit" like he prefers). The quality seems good, and I like that there is a double layer of fabric on the front legs from the thigh seams to the ankles. I'm going to exchange them for a medium, but I'm worried that the waist will be too big. I did order the Under Armour belt with them, and the metal part that adjusts the the size is a little big to thread through the belt loops, but not a deal breaker. I found it easiest to thread the belt through the loops before he put the pants on. I will update this review after we try the medium.

My son wore these baseball pants all spring season and they held up relatively well. I gave 4 stars because they did develop a whole in the knee, but I think that was to be expected by the end of the season. We have other white baseball pants that are pretty see through, but these Under Armour pants are not. I will be ordering the same pair next season if white is required.

My son likes the long length and style of these baseball pants. He is slim and weighs about 62 lbs, the small fits well. The belt loops are a little hard to fit the under armor belt through. So far the knees have worn quickly and stains from the astroturf do not come out easily.

My son is thin, but has long legs so baseball pants can be tricky. These worked well.