AMD Ryzen 5 2400G Processor with Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics - YD2400C5FBBOX

Funciona impecable en el equipo.

This cpu works as intended. Not sure I can say much more about it other than... don't worry about overclocking the cpu cores so much. Worry more about running a high speed memory profile. So, e.g. the BIOS will typically boot the DDR at 2133 stock, but if you purchase high speed memory such as 2933 or 3300 or something like that you can enable the higher speed in the BIOS and that will get you probably 90% of the performance boost right there (vs also overclocking the cpu core), while burning around the same amount of power as on a non-overclocked system. It's really the best way to go for this cpu.The GPU is particularly sensitive to memory performance since it is limited by system memory bandwidth. So focusing on buying high-speed memory (e.g. in the 2966-3300 range) gives you much more bang for your buck.I've been able to test this with a few games, but not being a heavy gamer all I really had was WoW and GW, neither of which need high-end GPUs. With dual 4K monitors I found that the GPU works amazing well at 2560x1440, giving me a solid 30-60fps (remember this is an iGPU), smooth and very play-friendly at high settings. At 4K resolution I get 15-30 fps or so but it isn't smooth and there is noticeable input lag. Not unexpected since even high-end GPUs have problems at 4K. Desktop works great at 4K, of course.I'm very happy with this cpu. I have it in a mini-itx case and mobo with a Noctua air cooler/fan and its dead silent and cool enough that I don't even need to connect up the case fan (cpu fan, yes, case fan, no).-Matt

I would personally go with Ryzen 3 2200g or Ryzen 7 1700x. Great processor but for $5 more I’d buy the Ryzen 1700x. If you don’t have a graphics card then instead of using built in graphics, buy a Athlon 200ge (overclock to 4Ghz) and pair with a used rx 580 or gtx 1060. I’ve built many systems (a couple Athlon based) and Athlon 200ge for $50 even (at time of posting) seems to be best deal for low/mid-low GPU’s. I built a $350 budget system with a used 8gb rx 580 for $120 and averaged 70fps on beautiful settings (with 1080p) on rust. If you plan on later pairing a better gpu then a 1060 or 580 in this system then go with Ryzen 3 2200g and use Vega 8 in 720p until you can afford a rtx 2060 or Vega 56. I did this for awhile and gaming was great on Ryzen 3. Easily overclockable both gpu and cpu. If you want the most from Ryzen 3 Vega 8 then don’t overclock cpu (to conserve heat) then overclock gpu clock to 1,600Mhz or higher if u can! I would get 60+ FPS on mid/high settings with 720p on apex ledgends with Vega 8 overclocked to 1,650Mhz. The ryzen 5 cpu doesn’t have a place in my heart sadly. It performs good and I’m sure has an application. But for gaming I’d go with 2nd gen ryzen 3 or 1st gen ryzen 7 (currently $155 on Amazon). Posting this as of 2/26/19. When zen releases or ryzen 5 2400g price dips below $150 then my opinion could very well change.

Ok, so I originally gave this processor a pretty harsh review. I was having Windows 10 stability issues and I couldn’t even run old games like HL2 at low settings. I am running this on a brand new x470 series mobo (MSI Gaming Plus) and it turns out my issue was driver related. Specifically, the chipset driver which also includes the radeon graphics driver and toolset. The MSI driver tool appeard to have downloaded and installed the chipset driver but indeed it had not, so I would say that MSI’s driver update tool is not the best. I went directly to MSI’s website and downloaded the chipset driver for Raven Ridge, installed, rebooted, and wow...am I impressed!I said I would bump my review up one star if I could correct the stability issues, and indeed it was due to my own error (albeit the driver tool didn’t help). But the gaming performance is so shockingly awesome, that I gave it a full 5 stars!It’s amazing to go back and play a game like HL2, which I built a computer for over 10 years ago almost for the sole purpose of playing, and run it at max settings without a dedicated graphics card.But the true surprise came when I loaded up Skyrim and played it at High settings (Framerates were a bit low on Ultra...but certainly playable) and this was with the High res texture packs enabled. Impressive. All in all, this definitely delivers at least console level performance in terms of graphics, and it is exactly what I was hoping for, and then a little bit more.