LUMIX G II Vario Lens, 100-300MM, MIRRORLESS Micro Four Thirds, Power O.I.S, H-FSA100300 (USA Black)

I don't think there is a better bang for the buck lens out there for the G line of cameras. The image stabilization of this lens rivals that of my canon 100-300 and still has a very good picture for video all the way out to 300. It may not perform the best in low light but it gets the job done and doesn't break the bank. The zoom is a little tight to start with but has softened up after use to look smooth enough for video. it feels a little lens heavy on the body so make sure you have a steady tripod for video and the gorilla pod won't be very steady for zoom work. The lens shade is perfect sized and you can still use the lens caps without taking off the shade. Update jan 2018....This lens has produced some of the best long range animal footage I could have hoped for in such a small and light format. The video is crisp, clean and clear and auto focus works really fast. It produces great bokeh and the stabilization is on par or better than my big canon lenses. Totally impressed.

I'm using this lens on a Panasonic g85. It is definitely a nice runs a must-have to your kit. It will definitely add some serious weight to your camera. The images are superb. I love the fact that it's weather sealed. When manic focus the focus ring is smooth. When zooming out it is extremely smooth. For the zooming ring it is what they like a soft rubbery texture which is excellent grip. It's a beautiful piece of glass. Super crisp and sharp pictures. Definitely worth it. If you're thinking about it and you're willing to spend the money it's worth it. I have rented the 200 to 400 mm lens. Buy Panasonic. That is a superbly beautiful lens and its own. To get that extra range it's not worth paying double the price. Just need to upgrade my 7-14 mm wide-angle lens from Panasonic to 8-16 mm Leica lens. To make my kit complete. Definitely recommend the 100 to 300 mm this is a must have.

The lens offers wonderful optics and light performance, is reasonably priced, and is easy to carry. It produces images with good quality and features optical image stabilization.

Plenty sharp, even with the aperture wide open. Not as sharp as more expensive lenses with long focal lengths, but doesn't need to be. Focuses very well on my Olympus and Panasonic cameras. Smooth mechanical operation and magnificent image stabilization, especially with cameras supporting Panasonic's Dual IS. Weather-sealing seals the deal for me. So why not five stars? Because zoomed in toward 300mm, the optics are slightly decentered, which usually introduces softness at the right edge of the frame. Research tells me this is a common problem with the 100-300mm lens, including version 1 (which means Panasonic has had a long time to improve quality, but hasn't done so). Also, the focus ring has a really cheap feel to it, compared with all the other lenses I own. These problems are acceptable for me, but could be serious enough for some users to make them want to either try many copies of the lens or go with an alternative.

This type of micro four thirds lens is what the system was designed for. The lens itself is about the size of a can of Coke and weighs about the same too. For the price, you will have to put up with variable aperture and lens that extends to almost double in length. Neither of these is a concern for me, and I appreciate the trade off in optical perfection for a very portable ultra telephoto zoom. I have quite a few Canon cameras and zooms, and they work wonderfully, but I don't have anything that touches this lens for reach. Yes, I could crop in with a crop sensor or full frame, but I'll be losing pixels if I do. Here, I don't have to make that sacrifice. Bokeh is a non-issue at these lengths. Any small separation of the subject from the background will create wonderful results at f5.6. Besides the obvious use such as wildlife photography, this is a very capable long portrait lens. Highly recommended!

Thinking of getting into wildlife photography? Can’t decide between this lens or the OM/Olympus 75-300mm lens? Read on and maybe this review will help you. I have been shooting with Micro Four Thirds since 2015. I have tried other format and brands over the years as well. I have owned 3 different Olympus 75-300mm lenses and 2 Panasonic 100-300mm lenses. As of right now, I only have the Panasonic 100-300mm lens. Comparing the 2 lenses: The Olympus lens is lighter and slightly smaller in size than the Panasonic lens. When you factor in the lens hood, they are similar in size. The Olympus lens starts at a wider Focal Length of 75mm vs Panasonic 100mm. The Olympus lens has a shorter minimum focal distance. The Panasonic has a brighter aperture of f5.6 at 300mm vs f6.7 on the Olympus. The Panasonic comes with a lens hood and the Olympus does not. The build quality feels better on the Panasonic and I like the rubber grip on the zoom ring. The Olympus lens feels like a cheap kit lens. The Panasonic has Optical Image Stabilization while the Olympus does not. The Panasonic is "Splash proof / Dustproof" while the Olympus is not. Auto Focus performance: If you’re using a capable camera body such as the OM-1, both lenses will perform about the same. The Panasonic lens AF performance will better on Panasonic bodies. When I used the Olympus lens on the Panasonic G9II I was very disappointed with the AF. The Panasonic 100-300mm AF performance was much better. But on my OM-1 Mark I camera, I don’t notice any difference between the 2 lens AF. Honestly in order to fully get the most of theses lenses for wildlife photography, you should use high-end camera bodies. Sharpness between the 2 lenses: Flip a coin! As I stated before, I have own several copies of both lenses and there’s no clear winner. One lens may be a little sharper but it’s more due to sample variation, so you better hope you’re lucky and get a sharp lens! Now, keep in the mind the cost of these lens. They are not going to be as sharp as more expensive lenses. But I feel the sharpness is fine for size and reach you get from these 2 lenses. I’ve included a crop image of a test chart that is at 100% zoom in so you judge for yourself. The image was taken with the Panasonic lens on my OM-1 at 300mm at F5.6. I found both lens sharpness is best around F7.1 to F8. So should you get the Olympus or Panasonic lens? Well it really depends on your needs. I mostly own OM lens and this is the only Panasonic lens I have. I sold my OM 75-300mm lens as I found this lens is better for my needs. This lens pair with my OM-1 is my compact & take any where wildlife setup. I love this setup and the images it can produce. When you're ready to step-up, then look at the Panasonic 100-400mm or OM 100-400mm lens. I have the OM 100-400mm and it's a better lens overall and my preferred setup. But as I stated, I won't sell this Panasonic lens due to the size, reach, and wonderful images I can get from this lens.

This lens is quite fun. I pair it with my Panasonic GM5 . As with any modern camera and lens, the resulting image files are high quality. To a large extent (imo), the results depend upon the individual behind the camera. This lens works well for lunar photography. Also, great for small animals. However, for very small birds, such as hummingbirds, best results will be at ~10 feet or less. Otherwise, the photo will require an excessive crop in post production. Note, the hummingbird video I uploaded to Amazon isn't displaying the full resolution of the original file. I uploaded it to YouTube for a better viewing experience. The plastic body feels solid. A small nitpick is the telescoping zoom. I would prefer an internal zoom mechanism. Between shots, I sometimes inadvertently press on the end of the lens while it is zoomed out. This pushes the lens in, and ruins my focus. Ooops! A constant aperture would also be great, but I understand these features would make the lens bigger, heavier, and more expensive. Big props to Panasonic for including the hood! It is very much appreciated. Hear that Canon? None of this hood-sold-separately for $40 nonsense.

Very good purchase. Sharper when used in manual mode

Great sharp lens that is small enough to throw in a bag and not worry about the weight. With the focal range of 600mm equivalent for the price, it’s a definite win.

Bought it during special discount.

Quando fotografavo a pellicola, sono sempre stato negato nell'uso dei teleobiettivi. Scattando a 100 iso, senza stabilizzatore, sia con il 200mm che con il 300, a mano libera (ottiche poco luminose, altrimenti avrei dovuto accendere un mutuo e comprare un furgone solo per i teleobiettivi), le mie foto erano sempre affette da micromosso, o da una leggera sfocatura, anche scattando con tempi, teoricamente, di sicurezza. Da quando sono entrato, dopo anni di letargo, nel sistema Micro 4/3 Lumix, mi si è aperto un mondo tutto nuovo e meraviglioso. Dopo aver preso la mano col 45-150, che equivale ad un 90-300 nel pieno formato, non ho resistito, e ho ordinato il Lumix Vario 100-300 II f/4-5.6 Avere un 600 mm f/5.6 era un sogno proibito da sempre. Il fattore di crop, o di moltiplicazione, degli obiettivi micro 4/3 è di 2x, quindi questo obiettivo equivale a dei cannoni giganteschi nel formato pieno o anche in Aps-c. Qui abbiamo un obiettivo delle dimensioni di una lattina di coca cola, che sta quasi in tasca, e questo è il primo, enorme vantaggio. Il secondo vantaggio è il prezzo: con 600 euro o poco più, ci si porta a casa un 200-600 equivalente, dalla luminosità nemmeno scandalosa. Esiste uno Zuiko 75-300 e costa anche un po' meno, ma a 300 mm è un f/6.7, cioè quasi uno stop in meno, e non è stabilizzato! Il terzo, enorme vantaggio, si chiama Power O.I.S. : questo obiettivo è dotato del sisrema di stabilizzazione interna più evoluto di casa Panasonic. Esiste una versione precedente, dotata di Mega O.I.S. Meglio prendere questa, la versione II, molto più efficace. Montato sulla mia G90, ho una doppia stabilizzazione ottica! Infatti sono riuscito finalmente a scattare a 600 mm, foto che mai avrei pensato di poter fare. La resa ottica di questa lente non è la più tagliente dell'universo, ma si difende bene. Sinceramente, la nitidezza delle foto, mi è sembrata più che valida, anche a tutta apertura. Per le esigenze di un fotoamatore, non mi posso lamentare. Anche la velocità di messa a fuoco è più che sifficiente. Non sono un fotografo sportivo, uso questo obiettivo per fotografare animaletti e persone. Inserendo il tracking sulla mia G90, sono riuscito a seguire i germani in acqua anche quando passavano dietro le foglie, senza che la macchina perdesse il fuoco (merito della macchina) e con una risposta dell'obiettivo sempre molto veloce. Non so se si comporterà in modo valido anche con soggetti più veloci, ma per ora sono soddisfatto. L'obiettivo è realizzato interamente in policarbonato. Non ha giochi e le ghiere scorrono in modo fluido. La ghiera dello zoom è rivestita in gomma. C'è un interruttore sul barilotto per escludere lo stabilizzatore. Non ne comprendo appieno l'utilità, dato che è facile operare direttamente dal corpo macchina, almeno sulla G90, ma penso lo abbiano inserito per risparmiare batteria, e per corpi macchina in cui occorre accedere al menù per comandare la stabilizzazione, con maggiore perdita di tempo. In dotazione c'è un paraluce con innesto a baionetta e una custodia morbida. Ho ordinato questo obiettivo da Amazon UK perché su Amazon EU è quasi sempre esaurito. Esperienza tragica. Dopo il brexit, ordinare da UK è diventato un calvario. Prima di riceverlo ho dovuto fornire a Ups altri dati aggiuntivi, fotocopie dei documenti ecc. E il tracking non è stato quasi mai aggiornato. Se potete, prendetelo da amazon EU, costa anche qualcosa in meno.

Buen lente para tomas de lejos y si no le importa que sea algo oscuro las tomas a 300mm pero lo uso en una cámara de video así que todo va bien

This lens is a great addition to my camera accessories. Having a zoom rating of 100 to 300 makes some of the impossible snaps or videos possible. Works extremely well with my Panasonic G100 camera.