Binoculars Safari UltraSharp 8x22 - German Quality Optics, Compact, Light, Ideal for Travel, Hiking, Sports and Nature Observation

Ordered December 25, paid extra for faster shipping as my last amazon order was not even shipped until two weeks after ordering, so did not want to go through that again. These are made in Germany, shipped from Poland and arrived December 31, before the earliest promised date. The binoculars are entry level Steiner and since I have not had any experience with the brand I was not sure what to expect. They are well made, and clearer and brighter than the Tasco I have been using, although not significantly so. Very happy at this price point and would buy again.

light weight and the optics were clear.

I had expensive binoculars 7x35 , but lost them in the Maine state lakes than my canoe flip over..:)))After that I bought this one and very happy.. actually I am surprised how amazing they are.Need some time to used to your eyes, but after that you going to understand this is highest quality product.One more thing - before buying I was not sure how good they are in the dark, and now I can say they are very good at night, better them may last 7x35.

Remarkable imaging for compact binoculars

fast shipping , great price

I was able to see everything very clearly. I used them in the forest and on a boat. I like that they are lightweight and come with a carrying case.I would have liked some sense caps, however.Highly recommend these

liked the product, extremely handy & lightweight.only concern is the price

When I purchased these (8x22 Safari Ultrasharp model) they were $115. The same model in 10x26 was $247. Most of the time binocular models of the same instrument class don't vary in price this much and normally there's a 10% difference in price between 8x and 10x versions of the same, compact model. It was because of the $247 price point on the 10x25 version that I suspected the 8x22 model might just be a really good deal and "under priced" in its category at the time I purchased. It's also my understanding that this model has been discontinued as it's not currently on Steiner's website at time of review. As a price point example on a current model, the Steiner 8x22 and 10x26 Blue Horizon models are $194 and $199 respectively. Again, I was keeping my fingers crossed that perhaps this was a $250 class optic, that was on close-out or perhaps wasn't a popular seller compared to the 10x26, so I took a chance. Unfortunately, it just doesn't deliver from an optical standpoint.I have an enormous amount of optical experience and own about 25 binoculars. Most of them are higher end optics from Swarovski, Zeiss, Leica, Nikon and several Canon IS binoculars. Most of the time you get what you pay for but occasionally, I'll discover some real respectable performance from instruments that aren't terribly expensive.Steiner currently produces some of the most unattractive binocular models in the industry, with their bizarre, ribbed armoring and what Steiner believes to be modern styling cues. Nevertheless, I'm always willing to give Steiner a shot, when the price seems right.On the positive side, they are fairly light at 242grams or 8.5oz (not including neck strap). Also, the hinge tension between the two barrels is just about perfect and leaning toward the firm side. This is nice on a pocket binocular because it's not uncommon that compact binoculars like these loosen a bit with use. The focus is smooth but not linear and different amounts of resistance are felt throughout the focus range. Overall, the appearance, fit and finish is quite nice. Reasonably sharp for a roof prism at this price point but only in the middle of the FOV (Field of View).On the neutral side, the two barrels don't come all the way together in the folded position and leave about 12mm gap in the center, at the fully closed position. This isn't uncommon in its category but some models do fold fully together, making them even more compact. The diopter adjustment ring, which is placed on the left barrel, is far to loose and moves around too easily. The slightest touch or movement against your shirt while hanging from your neck, will shift the adjustment. This might be tolerable by some but it was a bit disappointing considering how nice the barrel hinge tension was. Lastly, the colors are fairly neutral, while slightly leaning to the warm side. Greens and yellows appear a touch amplified but not bad at all compared to other optics in this class.The negatives points are all in the area of the optics but at least one deficiency is inexcusable from this brand and this price point. The sharpness is the center of the FOV (field of view) is reasonable but the image doesn't pop in and out of focus with any snappiness. You sort of turn the focus wheel past the point of focus and then have to back it up a few degrees, hunting with the focus while you brain figures out exactly where the image looks best. Most Nikon Trailblazer's (for example) at $75 have a less ambiguous point of focus. Next, the blurring at the edge of FOV is really noticeable. If the center of the FOV is the starting point and the edge is 100%, I'd estimate the blurring begins at 50-60% from the center of the FOV. The blurring at the last 15% of the edge of FOV is positively horrendous and completely unusable. Because of this, you really need to steer objects to the center of the FOV in order to get reasonably sharp detail. Some moderately price roof prism binoculars will allow some wandering of your eye within the FOV but not these. Lastly, is the major issue of internal reflections. In fact, they're so distracting that it makes this binocular a chore to enjoy, despite it's nice size, fit and finish. It's most noticeable past the edge of FOV, in what would normally be the blackened area of the image. In the black, directly adjacent to the edge of the FOV, there are all kinds of bronze colored reflections that dance around as you pan or tilt the binocular while viewing. These internal reflections sweep, dance and swim around the edge of the black circle like a reflection from a bulb or glass. The average or inexperienced binocular user might not even notice this type of thing initially, but once you know it's there, it's really difficult to ignore. The exit pupils might be a visual, external evidence to this issue. When you hold the binocular are arms length, instead of one small dot of light coming from each occular (eye piece) asymmetrical waves of reflections are present. Additionally, the exit pupils are slightly truncated (not perfectly round) Sometimes this means that something is slightly out of alignment but it call also mean that the internal prisms are too small for the optical configuration of the eye piece. I'll include some pictures. To top things off, there are some fine glue or polymer strands visible in the right barrel when shinning a flashlight through the objective side. They don't appear to be loose or floating however, they are in the optical path between the objective an prism.If it wasn't for the issue of internal reflections and fairly truncated exit pupils, the blurring starting at 50-60% from center of Field of View might be overlooked, depending on how one is using the binocular. A binocular with these optical characteristics is best used for a quick identification of an object that's already in view. Perhaps that's looking at a sign, trail marker, license plate or trying to figure out if there's someone you know while on the trail. It might be okay for getting a better look at an animal, that you already know is there. When you start searching for objects or want to enjoy large views of the topography, that's where this binocular becomes increasingly dissatisfying. With all of this stated, it's notoriously difficult to find a decent roof prism binocular, smaller than 25mm objectives for under $250. You're probably still better off to purchase a compact,Porro Prism model from Nikon or Pentax, as they typically won't have this kind severe blurring off axis, or strong internal reflections, as seen in this 8x22 Steiner. A Porro Prism will be slightly larger and might even weigh a couple ounces more, but the image will be superior in almost every regard.At the $115 (current price point) it's not the worst binocular that I ever experienced but if the 10x26 suffers from the same optical properties at $247 (current pricing) then this just reaffirms the issues with Steiner's perceived quality and name branding, vs. actual performance, which is often substandard at a particular price point, compared to competitive brands like Nikon and Vortex.EDIT 5/6/2020 After several failed attempts over several days, I accidentally discovered through an outside source, that Amazon no longer gives reviewers the option to post pictures. Of course, no where does Amazon specifically tell us this, with a update banner, somewhere around the vicinity where we would normally click that option because that would be far too helpful. If this ever changes, I have 6 photos to go along with my review.

Delighted with these! Researched carefully before purchasing as I have poorer eyesight in eye than the other - I have macular deneration and wear specs for short and long distance. With these binos I don’t wear specs (unlike with my previous larger binos) as I can easily adjust for different sight in each eye. They are small and very lightweight but appear robust and are easy to hold without any shaking. I’m pleased I opted for 8 x 22 and not the 10 x 25 version as whilst I’m yet to try them on our hols in Africa, I tested them in our long garden spotting birds, butterflies as well as horses in the fields beyond in very clear detail. I am well-impressed with the colours and clarity and the excellent field of vision. Ideal for women, may be too small for larger hands. Provided bag a little larger than needed but I’m unlikely to use it except for storage.

Nachdem mein Steiner Commander II 7x50 seit 20 Jahren gute Dienste leistet, für nicht maritime Anwendungen aber einfach zu schwer ist, wollte ich mir was Kleines gönnen, wobei die Qualität ordentlich sein sollte - für herausragende Optik habe ich ja noch das Steiner. Zur Auswahl standen- Steiner Safari Ultra Sharp 8x22- Eschenbach Trophy F 8x25 B allwetter und- Eschenbach farlux F allwetter 8x24 B SondereditionDas Trophy ist dabei 50% teurer als das Steiner, kostet aber dennoch nur die Hälfte des farlux. Alle drei Gläser sind wasserdicht, die beiden Eschenbach auch mit Stickstoff gefüllt, so dass sie innen nicht beschlagen können.Eine mehr als 8-fache Vergrößerung wollte ich nicht, da das Bild ohne Stabilistaor dann schon langsam das Wackeln anfängt. Wer ruhige Hände hat, kann ein 10er probieren, mir ist das aber zu wackelig. Damit das Glas kompakt bleibt (war für mich wichtig), sollte der Objektivdurchmesser möglicht klein, jedenfalls nicht größer als 25mm sein (für Anwendungen in der Nacht habe ich ja noch das 7x50, wenn es denn darauf ankommen sollte).Im Vergleich durchgefallen ist das billigste Glas von Steiner. Die Optik ist nicht schlecht - für den Preis wohl sogar sehr ordentlich -, fällt aber gegen die beiden Eschenbachs deutlich ab.Das Trophy ist etwa 1cm länger als das farlux und ca 70g schwerer - das Steiner liegt gewichtsmäßig dazwischen, ist auch sehr kurz, dafür aber einen Tick breiter. Die Optik ist bei beiden Eschenbach Gläsern recht gut, wobei ich beim farlux den Eindruck einer größeren Streulichtempfindlichkeit hatte. Beide Gläser bieten ein herausdrehbares Brillenträgerokular. Das ist m.E. besser als die umplappbare Gummimuschel beim Steiner, jedenfalls wenn das Glas abwechselnd von Brillen- und Nicht-Brillenträgern genutzt wird. Normalsichtige können das anders sehen.Farlux und Steiner lassen sich mE besser als das Trophy bedienen, da die Rolle für den Mitteltrieb einen größeren Durchmesser hat. Man muss so weniger Kraft aufwenden und kann besser scharf stellen. Die Gummiarmierung des Steiner Glases macht dieses auch sehr griffig. Abdeckkappen sind beim Steiner nicht dabei. Bei den beiden Eschenbach Gläsern sind die Plastikkappen nur lose aufzustecken, d.h. langfristig fehlen die auch irgendwann.Die Tasche beim Trophy ist die kleinste der drei Gläser, obwohl das Glas eher das Größte ist. Ich finde das gut, denn zum Rumtragen will ich eine kompakte Tasche haben. Beim farlux muss offenbar noch Platz für den eher breiten Tragriemen geschaffen werden, der zwar bequem sein mag, für ein Kompaktglas aber doch eher zu sehr aufträgt. Das Trophy kommt mit einer banalen Kordel aus - mir ist das lieber. Die Tasche von Steiner liegt dazwischen. Sie geht ist mit einem Reißverschluss ausgestattet, während Eschenbach auf Klettverschlüsse setzt - Geschmackssache.Ich hätte wohl dennoch das teuerste Gerät (farlux) genommen, da es das Kleinste und gleichzeitig am besten zu bedienende Glas ist, auch wenn ich optisch (ohne zu ausgiebigen Test) keinen signifikanten Unterschied zum Trophy festmachen konnte, wenn, ja wenn ich kein Brillenträger wäre. Beim Trophy ist die Pupillenschnittweite größer und das merkt man (als Brillenträger) leider auch. Das Steiner war insoweit auch ok.Fazit: das Eschenbach Trophy 8x25 ist für mich und meinen Bedarf das Beste der drei genannten Gläser. Es hat ein sehr gutes Preis-Leistungsverhältnis. Wer keine Brille trägt oder diese grundsätzlich bei der Beobachtung abnimmt, sollte durchaus mal einen Blick auf das Eschenbach farlux 8x24 werfen.Wegen des günstigen Preises und der sehr guten Bedienbarkeit gebe ich dennoch 5 Sterne. Wenn man weiß, was man für welchen Zweck bestellt ist das kleine Steiner ein sehr gutes Glas mit hervorragendem Pris-Leistungsverhältnis.

Pequeños prismáticos potentes ideales para viajar con ellos y hacer trekking, no pesan nada de nada, no abultan nada y funcionan muy bien. En el paquete viene con una funda para sujetar al cinturón del pantalón, pero no con correa para colgar al hombro, pero si tienen correa los prismáticos en si. Muy buena compra.Envío rápido y sin problema

These are phenomenal binoculars for the price. They are light and compact while still feeling sturdy and well-constructed. They're water-resistant and fogproof, meaning I can take them for a hike in rain without worry. The design is ergonomic and very comfortable to hold, and is rather stylish without being garish. The eye-cups are also a very nice touch, allowing me to use the binoculars while wearing glasses. The clarity and contrast are exceptional. Highly recommend these!

Se avete bisogno qualcosa di piccolo da avere sempre a portata di mano ma con una qualità ottica e costruttiva che non vi deluda, con questo Steiner andate sul sicuro.