DNA of the Gods: The Anunnaki Creation of Eve and the Alien Battle for Humanity

I've read over 200 books on ancient humans and this one solves two important mysteries which are not outlined in the book. 1. Why do 223 out of 20,000 human genes appear to have been replaced? 2. How are humans the only ones to violate the rule that only one species at a time dominates an environment? Up to twelve forms of humans occupied the Africa/Europe enfironment often interbreeding.The answer is in this book which translates Sumerian writings which plainly explain what they knew 4,000 years ago. A prior civilization of gods, or angels, or highly-developed humans modified human DNA to create a human who would take instructions better without becoming a threat to the gods. You'll have to read the story for yourself; it is clearly written out in plain language.The book isn't accurate with dates. It has Noah's flood around 11,000 BC when it was actually 3,113 BC. Yes there was a deluge in 10,802 BC but it was long before the first sentient beings who the Bible calls Adam and Eve, were created. This book both confirms and modifies Biblical statements and in my opinion, is more coherent and parallel with observable science and history.It's time we acknowledged Enlil with all his faults, Enki with all his benefits, and Ninmah for her biological accuracy in creating sentient humans as well as the plants necessary to create beer and wine. You'll learn a lot by reading this book. I recommend it highly.

There are more than a few books out there on how we humans came into being, most of them coming from a male point of view, now we have a female point of view. Chris H. Hardy PH.D., brings a new perspective to the story, and one that is badly needed. Females have been the villain of our story for far too long, though how we can blame them for wanting to be as knowledgeable as their parents is a bit of a mystery.According to the research of Hardy, Eve(Tiamat), had more alien DNA in her than Adam so she taught him what she knew. I guess by blaming females for knowledge, we have to assume that Adam wanted to remain blissfully ignorant and obedient to his Lord and master.So here's the story in a nutshell, Once upon a time there were two brothers. They came from a planet that is larger than Earth, therefore they were larger than the average hominoid inhabiting Earth(just check out some of the statues and art of ancient times to see the difference. Also, kings had harems, which I'm assuming is because they might lose a wife or two who died having their large offspring).The two brothers were both princes, and their names were Enki and Enlil. They had a sister Ninersag who worked with Enki to create a hominoid worker to mine gold(in Africa) to seed the atmosphere of their big planet where their dad Anu, the king resided. Enki and Ninmah were both scientists, and they used their own DNA to create humans(lulus) to work the mines.Enlil was the politician of the family in all the worse ways. He wanted humans to remain as slaves, while Enki wanted humans to learn and to grow, so he gave them knowledge. Enki's symbol of the serpent(DNA strands), the same one we use in medicine, which tells us that our DNA can go up our spines to connect us fully with our spirits(the wings on the caduceus).Enlil, being lord of the air, has the symbol of the eagle, while Enki is the snake, and Ninmah is the mother-goddess symbol because she created us. Enlil hates his sister(all women) which is why his book, the Bible practically ignores women and the offshoot religions say that women have no rights and must submit to men.Hardy compares the Biblical stories to the Sumerian stories to show that while they are similar, the Biblical story makes Enlil the hero/God, and Enki the devil. I can only assume that the writers of the Bible were fans of Enlil, especially since the Old Testament is filled with stories of a jealous God wanted to destroy anyone who disagrees with him and goes around 'worshipping(working)' for other Gods.What this book does is show us the psychological underpinnings of our religions which still control us to this day. What those beliefs are based on and for me, the reason why the deeper you go into one of the patriarchal religions, the more unbalanced you can become to the point of drowning your children to save them, or blowing yourself up to gain entrance into heaven. Whereas, with one of the more balanced religions, you believe that there is spirit in all things and that we need to honor all life and remain in balance.I found this book to be a much needed balancing point to the works of Stitchin and all of the others that examine the physical facts.

I felt the book could have been better organized. The author uses terms like "semantic" in what seem novel ways. There must be a better explanation for some of these terms, but none is given.It seems illogical to me that a planet that does not have a standard and closer orbit to a star could sustain life. If the Anunnakis are on such a planet that is seldom warmed by a Sun, they must live under ice caves a have translucent skin. No explanation is given for their 3600year orbits. Maybe the use nuclear to somehow warm their planet, but that seems a little crazy too.I did study ancient civil in college and do remember our professor showing slides of ancient Sumerian or Akkadians and were told they didn't racially seem to belong to any other humans. So maybe there is some truth to that.I do aged strongly with the authors comparison of the story of Genesis. Operative word...gene. I've never believed in Original Sin. Hardy does a great job showing how the people who plagiarized the more ancient Sumerian texts have falsely penned evil on women. Women have suffered for two thousand years and treated as an inferior of man because of the monotheistic religions.Also I feel the section on how the west and east differ on sex or rather lovemaking is very interesting. This was overall a thought provoking book.