Full description not available
K**R
Shaping the Political Arena
Shaping the Political Arena is a massive study of state-labor relations in 20th century Latin America. It is impossible to concisely summarize all of the book's major arguments, but the core of the argument goes as follows:In the early 20th century the relationship between the state and labor changed, as repression lessened and the state sought to institutionalize control through the recognition of some unions and the mobilization of workers as a political support base. This period marked the initial incorporation of labor, which was "the first sustained and at least partially successful attempt by the state to legitimate and shape an institutionalized labor movement" in which "institutionalized channels for resolving labor conflicts were created in order to supersede the ad hoc use of repression characteristic of earlier periods of state-labor relations, and the state came to assume a major role in institutionalizing a new system of class bargaining" (p. 7).The authors distinguish different patterns of labor incorporation. One pattern was state incorporation (Brazil and Chile), in which "the principal agency through which the incorporation period was initiated was the legal and bureaucratic apparatus of the state, and the principal goal of the leaders who initiated incorporation was the control and depoliticization of the labor movement" (p. 8). This contrasts with party incorporation in which a party sought to mobilize working class support. Party incorporation took three forms: electoral mobilization by a traditional party in which union-party links were minimal (Uruguay and Colombia), labor populism (Argentina and Peru), and radical populism which included the mobilization of the peasantry in addition to the working class (Mexico and Venezuela).The book's central claim is that this incorporation period was a critical juncture that shaped subsequent regime dynamics and party systems, and different forms of incorporation led to different long-term legacies. In examining the long-term heritage of incorporation, the authors focus "on whether a stable majority bloc emerged roughly at the center of the electoral arena, whether unions were linked to parties of the center or parties of the left, and, relatedly, whether the union movement was generally in the governing coalition or tended to be excluded. On the basis of these dimensions, four broad types of outcomes are identified: integrative party systems, multiparty polarizing systems, systems characterized by electoral stability and social conflict, and stalemated party systems" (p. 9). Ironically, the state incorporation efforts at control ultimately resulted in polarization as labor was left without strong integrative links to parties, while radical incorporation ultimately resulted in conservatization and the integration of labor.The book has several strengths, including the authors' deep knowledge of the cases, an intriguing argument about the long-run impact of labor policy, and a discussion of critical junctures near the beginning of the book that is still useful more than twenty years later. The book's argument is not without shortcomings, such as a lack of clear justification for the cutoff points between different periods in each case (the critical juncture, aftermath, and heritage). The book also often goes into more detail than is necessary to develop the argument, and it is easy to lose the argument's thread when wading through the empirical chapters. It is also important to note for prospective readers that Shaping the Political Arena is not a general history, but instead focuses squarely on labor politics and their impact on party systems and political regimes; it is best read if you have some familiarity with the histories of the countries studied. Shaping the Political Arena is an important book for specialists of Latin American history and politics and of comparative-historical research, but it is not a leisurely read for the casual reader.
O**N
Informative
This huge book was a bit overwhelming, as it presented an overview of development in Latin America. Sometimes it was confusing as the different nations didn't always have a great deal of overlap and there were comparisons drawn between them.
A**D
vague on critical junctures
This book emphasizes the role of critical junctures, but it remains vague about the meaning of critical junctures. It seems critical junctures can be both discrete moments in history and longer processes. Yet, over time more variables could affect the outcome of interest, meaning critical junctures probably play less of a role. The first chapter defines components of a critical juncture and the baseline for comparison, but still leaves the reader unsure as to how to identify a critical juncture and distinguish it from other explanatory variables.
Trustpilot
3 days ago
1 day ago