---
product_id: 126404750
title: "Indian Philosophy: Volume I: with an Introduction by J.N. Mohanty: v. 1 (Oxford India Collection) (Oxford India Collection (Paperback))"
price: "€ 56.80"
currency: EUR
in_stock: false
reviews_count: 9
url: https://www.desertcart.gr/products/126404750-indian-philosophy-volume-i-with-an-introduction-by-j-n
store_origin: GR
region: Greece
---

# Indian Philosophy: Volume I: with an Introduction by J.N. Mohanty: v. 1 (Oxford India Collection) (Oxford India Collection (Paperback))

**Price:** € 56.80
**Availability:** ❌ Out of Stock

## Quick Answers

- **What is this?** Indian Philosophy: Volume I: with an Introduction by J.N. Mohanty: v. 1 (Oxford India Collection) (Oxford India Collection (Paperback))
- **How much does it cost?** € 56.80 with free shipping
- **Is it available?** Currently out of stock
- **Where can I buy it?** [www.desertcart.gr](https://www.desertcart.gr/products/126404750-indian-philosophy-volume-i-with-an-introduction-by-j-n)

## Best For

- Customers looking for quality international products

## Why This Product

- Free international shipping included
- Worldwide delivery with tracking
- 15-day hassle-free returns

## Description

Indian Philosophy: Volume I: with an Introduction by J.N. Mohanty: v. 1 (Oxford India Collection) (Oxford India Collection (Paperback)) : Radhakrishnan: desertcart.co.uk: Books

Review: Indian Philosophy - I may have attempted this book in the heady mixed up 60's but all I can say now in my dwindling days this is a book needed to explain in detail of Indian Religious Philosophy from the movement of a population into North India from the Vedas to Buddhism. Its a detailed study into world faiths & can be applied to greater understanding into how this has fitted into world faiths in general; for those trying to figure our a solution of our crazy mixed up world. But quite heavy if your wrist muscles are weak with old age.
Review: As Far As It Goes - Indian Philosophy, Volume I Scholarly and immense, but in accessible Victorian prose. I'm not surprised it's remained the standard text for so long - who would now even begin to attempt to collate the whole of a civilisation's philosophy! Simultaneously ambitious and sprawling, complete and partial, disciplined and wayward, pedantic and phantastic, objective and personal, this worthy tome is a gathering and a marker. It serves well as fundamental introduction to the avenues of understanding that the mode of `Indian' experience must go down to achieve wisdom. Some prior interest in Indian philosophy - and therefore some patience - is presumed even in its Victorian compendiousness. My interest in reading often depended on which parts I found most pertinent. The first hundred pages or so go over the polytheism/henotheism of the Veda, and there is some accounting of the various Hindu deities etc. I was happier once we got to the Upanishads and, from there, the on-going reconfigurations and considerations of the absolute that is the contribution of India to world philosophy - the various formulations of the ground that have been overlooked [or one of which has been posited thoughtlessly as absolute and primary] by the narrower, religiously influenced `western' tradition. But for such an apparently comprehensive tome, it does sometimes feel sketchy. The book is not self-contained. Radhakrishnan frequently refers to things he himself hasn't yet described within his own text: he references sunyata without having explained what that might be. In fact, he steers clear of an exposition of the way in which Buddhism might be fundamentally different from Hinduism. It increasingly appears, in the course of his writing, that Radhakrishnan is not entirely self-effacing. The book begins to give an interesting, historical sense of the time in which it was written [first pub. 1922] and the intellectual and social predispositions of its author as well as the state of historical knowledge at the time. Radhakrishnan writes about Indian Philosophy within the purview of Schopenhauer, Hegel, the then current fashions and initial understandings of western expositors, and his own Hinduism. Radhakrishnan finds Hinduism more tenable than Buddhism: `As a philosophy and religion, the Gita is more complete than Buddhism...' p449. He negatively characterises the Hinayana, `It is not a healthy minded doctrine. A sort of world hatred is its inspiring motive.' Academically, and logically, he is unable to come to terms with the relativistic negation of an absolute in the basic premises of Buddhism. Apparently the Mahayana is superior to the untenable Hinayana because, `A metaphysical substratum is admitted.' Eh? He often insists that Buddha never denied the reality of the Atman: `Buddha is silent about the Atman enunciated in the Upanishads. He neither affirms nor denies its existence.' He then contradicts such assertions: for example, when positively quoting Nagarjuna on the very next page: `The Tathagata sometimes taught that the Atman exists, and at other times he taught that the Atman does not exist...' [p326/7.] Radhakrishnan does not clarify what it is that is being asserted and what denied, and how this is or is not Atman, or what is intended in relation to Atman/Brahman by the 'neither existence nor non-existence' of the middle way. Nor does he investigate the implications of emptiness; he has instead an emotional reaction against it - which itself is symptomatically interesting - and his language gets surprisingly graphic. The areas of text that are most fractured, contradictory and incoherent [though over a large Victorian scale of tens of pages, smuggled in to an apparent propriety] are those where he attempts to reconcile his respect for Buddha as a sage with his Hindu convictions. His exposition comes under pressure and seems to me to be contradictory - precisely because he cannot give up on there being an independently existing transcendent reality. His exposition continually reinvests Buddhism with this. And reinvests Hinduism with the insights of Buddhism. He provides a brilliantly clinical and precise exposition of the tenets of the Madhyamika and then says: but 'the whole show of Nagarjuna's logic is a screen for his heart, which believed in an absolute reality.' And yet, in a way, this is perhaps what happened historically with the consolidations of Shankara. It would seem equally churlish however [and incorrect for a Buddhist] to deny that Buddhism is intimately related to Hinduism; dependent as all theorizing and insight is upon the conditions of its time. Or, perhaps, the centrality of emptiness to contemporary understandings of Buddhism are themselves just a fashion and focus of now. Certainly Radhakrishnan seems to be on firmer and more trans-historical ground in his exegesis of the fundamentals of Hindu understanding. Therein, this book is colossal and the worthy prose often climbs to an impressive and inescapable ecstatic.

## Technical Specifications

| Specification | Value |
|---------------|-------|
| Best Sellers Rank | 1,488,080 in Books ( See Top 100 in Books ) 33 in Jainism (Books) 632 in Religious History of Hinduism 676 in Introduction to Philosophy |
| Book 2 of 2  | Oxford India Collection (Paperback) |
| Customer reviews | 4.6 4.6 out of 5 stars (383) |
| Dimensions  | 2.79 x 13.72 x 21.59 cm |
| Edition  | 2nd |
| ISBN-10  | 019569841X |
| ISBN-13  | 978-0195698411 |
| Item weight  | 430 g |
| Language  | English |
| Print length  | 664 pages |
| Publication date  | 30 April 2009 |
| Publisher  | OUP India |

## Images

![Indian Philosophy: Volume I: with an Introduction by J.N. Mohanty: v. 1 (Oxford India Collection) (Oxford India Collection (Paperback)) - Image 1](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/81nz4S2VONL.jpg)

## Customer Reviews

### ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Indian Philosophy
*by D***N on 20 November 2012*

I may have attempted this book in the heady mixed up 60's but all I can say now in my dwindling days this is a book needed to explain in detail of Indian Religious Philosophy from the movement of a population into North India from the Vedas to Buddhism. Its a detailed study into world faiths & can be applied to greater understanding into how this has fitted into world faiths in general; for those trying to figure our a solution of our crazy mixed up world. But quite heavy if your wrist muscles are weak with old age.

### ⭐⭐⭐⭐ As Far As It Goes
*by M***L on 20 September 2013*

Indian Philosophy, Volume I Scholarly and immense, but in accessible Victorian prose. I'm not surprised it's remained the standard text for so long - who would now even begin to attempt to collate the whole of a civilisation's philosophy! Simultaneously ambitious and sprawling, complete and partial, disciplined and wayward, pedantic and phantastic, objective and personal, this worthy tome is a gathering and a marker. It serves well as fundamental introduction to the avenues of understanding that the mode of `Indian' experience must go down to achieve wisdom. Some prior interest in Indian philosophy - and therefore some patience - is presumed even in its Victorian compendiousness. My interest in reading often depended on which parts I found most pertinent. The first hundred pages or so go over the polytheism/henotheism of the Veda, and there is some accounting of the various Hindu deities etc. I was happier once we got to the Upanishads and, from there, the on-going reconfigurations and considerations of the absolute that is the contribution of India to world philosophy - the various formulations of the ground that have been overlooked [or one of which has been posited thoughtlessly as absolute and primary] by the narrower, religiously influenced `western' tradition. But for such an apparently comprehensive tome, it does sometimes feel sketchy. The book is not self-contained. Radhakrishnan frequently refers to things he himself hasn't yet described within his own text: he references sunyata without having explained what that might be. In fact, he steers clear of an exposition of the way in which Buddhism might be fundamentally different from Hinduism. It increasingly appears, in the course of his writing, that Radhakrishnan is not entirely self-effacing. The book begins to give an interesting, historical sense of the time in which it was written [first pub. 1922] and the intellectual and social predispositions of its author as well as the state of historical knowledge at the time. Radhakrishnan writes about Indian Philosophy within the purview of Schopenhauer, Hegel, the then current fashions and initial understandings of western expositors, and his own Hinduism. Radhakrishnan finds Hinduism more tenable than Buddhism: `As a philosophy and religion, the Gita is more complete than Buddhism...' p449. He negatively characterises the Hinayana, `It is not a healthy minded doctrine. A sort of world hatred is its inspiring motive.' Academically, and logically, he is unable to come to terms with the relativistic negation of an absolute in the basic premises of Buddhism. Apparently the Mahayana is superior to the untenable Hinayana because, `A metaphysical substratum is admitted.' Eh? He often insists that Buddha never denied the reality of the Atman: `Buddha is silent about the Atman enunciated in the Upanishads. He neither affirms nor denies its existence.' He then contradicts such assertions: for example, when positively quoting Nagarjuna on the very next page: `The Tathagata sometimes taught that the Atman exists, and at other times he taught that the Atman does not exist...' [p326/7.] Radhakrishnan does not clarify what it is that is being asserted and what denied, and how this is or is not Atman, or what is intended in relation to Atman/Brahman by the 'neither existence nor non-existence' of the middle way. Nor does he investigate the implications of emptiness; he has instead an emotional reaction against it - which itself is symptomatically interesting - and his language gets surprisingly graphic. The areas of text that are most fractured, contradictory and incoherent [though over a large Victorian scale of tens of pages, smuggled in to an apparent propriety] are those where he attempts to reconcile his respect for Buddha as a sage with his Hindu convictions. His exposition comes under pressure and seems to me to be contradictory - precisely because he cannot give up on there being an independently existing transcendent reality. His exposition continually reinvests Buddhism with this. And reinvests Hinduism with the insights of Buddhism. He provides a brilliantly clinical and precise exposition of the tenets of the Madhyamika and then says: but 'the whole show of Nagarjuna's logic is a screen for his heart, which believed in an absolute reality.' And yet, in a way, this is perhaps what happened historically with the consolidations of Shankara. It would seem equally churlish however [and incorrect for a Buddhist] to deny that Buddhism is intimately related to Hinduism; dependent as all theorizing and insight is upon the conditions of its time. Or, perhaps, the centrality of emptiness to contemporary understandings of Buddhism are themselves just a fashion and focus of now. Certainly Radhakrishnan seems to be on firmer and more trans-historical ground in his exegesis of the fundamentals of Hindu understanding. Therein, this book is colossal and the worthy prose often climbs to an impressive and inescapable ecstatic.

### ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Reasons for purchasing this book
*by R***N on 13 February 2013*

I can only say that the book reached me in excellent condition. I wanted to purchase this book because Radhkrishnan was a very good philosopher, and wrote realistically and meaningfully about the Hindu philosophy. In the UK, Christians don't read books by Hindu philosophers and are 'poorer' for it. I have read other books by Radhakrishnan, but this book will serve a special purpose for me. After perusal, I want to write a short review for Amazon.co.uk., but this will take time, because I'm now reading some books on Science and Christian Faith. Furthermore, Radhakrishnan's books are not an easy read and require a lot of concentration. I'm a very keen Christian, who would like to communicate the Christian Faith to Hindus, and I can think of no better way than to see how I would stand up to a strong Hindu philosopher, who was a genuinely good man. I wouldn't have normally written this piece, but your questainnaire was so worded that I had to respond...Robert Selvendran.

## Frequently Bought Together

- Indian Philosophy: Volume I: with an Introduction by J.N. Mohanty (Oxford India Collection (Paperback))
- Indian Philosophy: Volume II: with an Introduction by J.N. Mohanty
- Buddhism: A Christian Exploration and Appraisal

---

## Why Shop on Desertcart?

- 🛒 **Trusted by 1.3+ Million Shoppers** — Serving international shoppers since 2016
- 🌍 **Shop Globally** — Access 737+ million products across 21 categories
- 💰 **No Hidden Fees** — All customs, duties, and taxes included in the price
- 🔄 **15-Day Free Returns** — Hassle-free returns (30 days for PRO members)
- 🔒 **Secure Payments** — Trusted payment options with buyer protection
- ⭐ **TrustPilot Rated 4.5/5** — Based on 8,000+ happy customer reviews

**Shop now:** [https://www.desertcart.gr/products/126404750-indian-philosophy-volume-i-with-an-introduction-by-j-n](https://www.desertcart.gr/products/126404750-indian-philosophy-volume-i-with-an-introduction-by-j-n)

---

*Product available on Desertcart Greece*
*Store origin: GR*
*Last updated: 2026-02-24*